In chapter twenty-one I
enjoyed the section on two clusters of intelligence. In the 1960’s Raymond
Cattell, a personality researcher, and John Horn, a graduate student, concluded
that adult intelligence is best understood if various measures are grouped into
two categories, called fluid and crystallized. Fluid intelligence is those
types of basic intelligence that make learning of all sorts quick and thorough.
Abilities such as short-term memory, abstract thought, and speed of thinking
are all usually considered part of fluid intelligence. People that are high in
fluid abilities can draw inferences, understand relations between concepts and
readily process new ideas and facts. Fluid intelligence is usually measured by
puzzles because working memory is considered to be crucial. High fluid
intelligence in emerging adulthood can lead to a higher IQ and a longer life
due to the ability to detoxify stress. Crystalized intelligence is those types
of intellectual ability that reflect accumulated learning. Vocabulary and
general information are examples. Some developmental psychologists think
crystalized intelligence increases with age while fluid intelligence degreases.
Crystallized intelligence causes the result of widely reading ad deep thinking.
High crystalized intelligence in emerging adulthood predicts a high IQ later in
in life because the more people know, the more they can learn. In order to
detect a person’s intellectual aptitude both fluid and crystalized intelligence
is measured. I found this section to be interesting because I have never even
thought about measuring my intelligence until recently so I’d like to know how
it could be measured. As an adolescent I was a huge fan of puzzles, and I was
really good at them, so I am assuming I have a high fluid intelligence, but I don’t
think I detoxify stress that easily, which is a result of a high fluid
intelligence. Therefore I support the conclusion that crystalized intelligence
increases with age while fluid intelligence degreases. As I get older I tend to
think more deeply and read more, and I have not touched a puzzle in years. So I
completely agree with the theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment